The overall quality of the papers was good, with a considerable range of topics – see below.
Strengths
- You collectively examined a wide range of topics – we’ll hear about many of them in class.
- Several people pushed Revit a long way
- Several wound up questioning how easy this conversion to BIM really is
Problems
- A few people still had papers that were too general
- There were a few problems of lack of citations to support assertions
- A few people didn’t proofread very well and thus had silly grammar errors
Topics
01 Tannenbaum, Matt and Milligan, Kevin - BIM Creating Intelligent & Green Buildings
02, Drogalis, James and Young, Charlie - Drexel Smarthouse BIM Modeling
03 Glencross, Brandon and Patel, Neil - Revit Architecture and Structure
04 Belardi, Robert and Mahon, Bill - Robotic Applications in Construction
05 Kahn, Matthew and Regnier, Adam - The Ideal Sensor
06 Jurgelwicz, Kyle - Building a Family in Revit
07 Lin, Shuiqiang - BIM for Suppliers: how adapt in the transforming industry
08 Ferraioli, Michael - Revit Architecture and Structure
11 Matthews, Peter - Revit and Bentley Interchange
12 Donovan, Mark - Website Database Design
13 Brown, Lemond - Robotics in Construction
15 Auman, Jonathan - Safety and Efficiency Improvements with Robotics in Construction
17 Reiter, Squibb, Thorley - Using Revit to Redesign Myers Hall
18 Guarneri, Joesph- BIM Technology in the Construction Industry
19 Vu, Lynn - Cloud Computing & BIM
20 Day, Corey - Robotics In Building Automated Systems
No comments:
Post a Comment